× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. August 2006

RE: Allocate field with options(*nopass :*omit)

Lim,

I haven't time to test it, but I wouldn't mind betting that the single call
to CEEDOD will by itself take way longer than simply copying the parm value
as was originally suggested.  You're adding a lot of complexity to the code
in the hope of improving performance, but in reality I suspect you are
having exactly the opposite effect.

If you don't like the idea of copying, go with the suggestion earlier of
defining the variable to be used by the subproc as based (with it's pointer
pre-initialized to the address of the default value) and simply flip the
pointer to the address of the parm if one is supplied.  In terms of raw
speed I would expect that to be the fastest version. 

Jon Paris
Partner400

www.Partner400.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.