|
We use it a lot where someone else might use OPNQRYF. IMHO it's much easier to use SQL for record selection than OPNQRYF. I think flexibility and performance gain also. Really, the number of records returned is a function of the size of the database as well as the query. Running the same query on a database containing a few million records and against a database containing a few hundred million records could give very different result set sizes. There's also the hard coded limit issue. If I put a hard coded limit into a program it will eventually be reached. Usually at the most inopportune time. Rick
-----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces+rick.chevalier=americredit.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces+rick.chevalier=americredit.com@midran ge.com] On Behalf Of Alan G. Campin Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 11:04 AM To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Controlling a fetch loopIn our shop it is common to work with files containinganywhere fromtens of millions to hundreds of millions of records. Our SQLstatementsroutinely return more than 32,766 records. I don't think it isuncommonto exceed this limit. It really isn't that large.I guess my struggle is why a program would end up processing that many records. I know that databases routinely contain many more records than that but why with SQL do you end up processing so many records? In File I/O it could make sense because you have to read in records to see the values (Assuming I am not using OPNQRYF) but with SQL, I select only what I need. Not disputing what you are saying, just wondering why you would need to process that many records.
Privileged and Confidential. This e-mail, and any attachments there to, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me immediately by a return e-mail and delete this e-mail. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and/or any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.