|
Charles, What is the advantage to having a NULL capable database field, as opposed to, say, blanks? Wouldn't that be easier? I ask because I don't understand. Thanks, Shannon O'Donnell -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wilt, Charles Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 2:53 PM To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries Subject: RPG IV not up to the task of reading and writing to DB files.... <vent> I've come to that conclusion after banging my head against the wall of RPG's (lack of) NULL support. I'm working on a new from the ground up application system that will eventually take the place of a poorly designed and written monolithic system we use right now. I've tried to do things the "right" way, a DB that uses triggers, constraints and null-capable fields; RPG service programs containing modularized code. I keep banging my head against the fact that many of my procedures deal with a variable that ends up in a NULL capable DB column. At least if my top level procedures get passed an OMIT'd variable, I can without trouble pass that along to lower level procedures. At the lowest level, when I go to write to the database, I can check the parameter and if it is OMIT'd I can set the DB null indicator. Even with the above, the programs calling those top level procedures have to jump through hoops to either OMIT or no OMIT the param. At least I don't have to code the multiple calls procedure each using a different combination parameters to be OMIT'd. Scott Klement and other helped with way around that requirement by playing games with basing pointers and local variables. The games are not pretty, but they are better looking than the alternative. Still, I have procedures that really need some way to return or set a reference variable to a NULL value. Can't be done, there's no such thing as a standalone null capable variable in RPG. Sure I can include my own null indicator, and I'm going to have to, but the resulting code is not pretty. For crying out loud if the DB supports NULLs shouldn't the primary programming language? This would be ideal: D myVar s 10a ALWNULL /free myVar = DoSomething(var1:var2:var3); DoSomethingElse(var4:myVar); /end-free Nope, instead I've got this crap... D myVar s 10a based(ptrMyVar) D myVarNULL s n D memMyVar s 10a /free DoSomething(var1:var2:var3:myVar:memMyVarNULL); if not myVarNULL; ptrMyVar = %addr(memMyVar); endif; DoSomethingElse(var4:myVar); /end-free Thanks for listening! </vent> Charles Wilt -- iSeries Systems Administrator / Developer Mitsubishi Electric Automotive America ph: 513-573-4343 fax: 513-398-1121
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.