|
Yes but bear in mind when converting termination subroutines the *INLR will NOT function as it was intended. Each procedure/subprocedure has it's own *INLR so if you expect *INLR in a subprocedure to unload your program....you're wrong.... Thanks, Tommy Holden -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Gibbs Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 1:22 PM To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Tool to convert Subroutine to SubProcedure Peter Dow (ML) wrote: > There is one minor benefit to simply changing subroutines to procedures > -- when debugging to step through the code, you can choose to not go > through a procedure by simply pressing F10; to step into the procedure > you would have to press F22. Now that you mention it ... that *IS* a fairly good reason to convert subroutines to procedures, even if you don't do anything else. david
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.