|
|Adding a new prototype to a copy book may lead to duplicate definitions. |So, in order to accomplish something in program A you extend a copy |book. A few months later you modify program B and it won't compile |(Experience? How did you guess.). Thus, it makes sense for a change |management system to force a compile for all sources referencing the |copy book. | |Joep Beckeringh | But program B wouldn't have had any trouble running during that time, since the compiled object still included the original copy book definitions. If there are duplicate references created by the new copy book definitions, there's no need to deal with them until you modify program B. If the CMS recompiled everything, you would have to make changes to program B and god knows how many other programs just to get your program A changes into production, when there really wasn't any need to do so. There's no reason a CMS should recompile everything unless there is a danger of the application failing to run as a result of the copy book changes, IMHO.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.