RE: Best way of using Service programs.

What was Turnover's reason for not using Binding Directories.

I myself am a big fan of Binding Directories because it eases compiling, and
as long as you don't fully qualify the binding directory entries you should
be fine when you deploy them to another machine and place them in a
different library than that of the dev machine (learned that one the hard
way :-)

Aaron Bartell 

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of praveen gunda
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:04 PM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Best way of using Service programs.

Hi all,

What is the best way of using service programs?

Should I bind my service programs directly to the RPGLE programs by
specifiying on CRTPGM command or use a binding directory?

These service programs are being developed and we may probably add more
Procedures to these over time.

We use Turnover for change management and Turnover has advised us not to use
Binding Directories?

I am kind of a New Bee, so any help is appreciated.

-Praveen
--
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or
change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.