|
>> Would we get performance improvements if we divided our 42 subprocedures into 5 or even 8 service programs? How long is a piece of string Booth? <grin> The simple answer to your question is - I doubt it very much. The longer answer is that you have to look at the tradeoffs. More subprocs means more initialization that may not be needed. More SrvPgms means more initialization of the SrvPgms. Part of the criteria is how likely the subprocs are to be used during the currency of the job. If they will likely be used at some point then the more subprocs in the SrvPgm the better. If they are only used once a month - they probably should be Pgms anyway. I have seen some shops load 250+ subprocs in a single SrvPgm without any problems. I have seen many that have a one subproc = one SrvPgm rule (which I think is just plain silly). Some will have a large SrvPgm for interactive use, but have more smaller SrvPgms for use in batch work where the job duration is shorter. You pays your money and you takes your choice. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com www.RPGWorld.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.