|
This comment is interesting:"... Those who study calendars unanimously recommend that the use of the term "Julian date" to mean "number of the day in the year" be dropped. It has been suggested in the Wikipedia article on ISO 8601 that the term ordinal date be used, and this seems sensible. ..."
This is very unlike IBM's usual preciseness with terminology. hmmmmm.... rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Ordinal vs. Julian?As I've always been led to believe a Julian date was YYDDD and a long Julian was YYYYDDD where DDD was which day of that particular year it was. However, true a Julian date is damn near explained like Star Trek's star date.http://www.hermetic.ch/cal_stud/jdn.htm Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.