× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



This comment is interesting:
"... Those who study calendars unanimously recommend that the use of the term "Julian date" to mean "number of the day in the year" be dropped. It has been suggested in the Wikipedia article on ISO 8601 that the term ordinal date be used, and this seems sensible. ..."

This is very unlike IBM's usual preciseness with terminology.

hmmmmm....


rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Ordinal vs. Julian?
As I've always been led to believe a Julian date was YYDDD and a long Julian was YYYYDDD where DDD was which day of that particular year it was. However, true a Julian date is damn near explained like Star Trek's star date.
http://www.hermetic.ch/cal_stud/jdn.htm


Rob Berendt


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.