|
James, Did you read my post? I don't understand how anyone would be able to come up with your conclusions from my comments. -Bob On 12/28/05 5:07 PM, "James Rich" <james@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Bob Cozzi wrote: > >> If all this java, java, java, write-once run anywhere crap is true (which I >> do not believe in by the way) then why not make the compiler an independent >> thing that could be ported to say OS/400 V5R1 or Linux or FreeBSD or AIX? >> >> The bottom line is we used RPG III for years and years ( a decade? ) before >> any enhancements were introduced except for ANDxx and ORxx. Oh and I think >> they stuck an ENDIF in there too. So why do we need enhancements on each and >> every release? Is this a U.S. Government "use it or loose it" mentality? >> In my view, IBM is making RPG IV harder and harder to learn use, and in >> which to develop products. This can only add up to only one outcome... > > It seems that you would rather return to "the good old days" of RPG III. > Is this true? In my opinion, RPG III is a *horrible* language. It > doesn't matter that many long lasting programs have been written with it, > RPG III is still a horrible language. The miniscule feature set and > rotten syntax of RPG III limited what could be done with it and forced > awful coding practices on developers. > > I think the statement the RPG IV is harder to develop products with is > absolutely ridiculous unless the application consists of nothing more than > reading a primary file and writing a report. In fact, many applications > are *impossible* to create with RPG III. I'm not talking about fancy > graphics that are simply wasteful, I'm talking about real, useful > applications that people need to get stuff done. Applications that save > money, time, and effort - not just in their development but also in their > use. > > I certainly hope there aren't any more decades where the only enhancements > to the primary language used on the iSeries is "ANDxx ORxx ENDIF". Good > grief, those aren't enhancements, those are required syntax for sensible > coding. > > James Rich > > It's not the software that's free; it's you. > - billyskank on Groklaw
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.