|
Java, java, java ... write once and use it forever not everywhere :-) I think IBM is moving RPG/LE towards OO but slowly. As far as enhancements/upgrades, I think IBM needs to pay the salaries too :-) -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Cozzi Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 2:15 PM To: 'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries' Subject: RE: free-format move *USA date value to 6-digit numeric in YMDformat If all this java, java, java, write-once run anywhere crap is true (which I do not believe in by the way) then why not make the compiler an independent thing that could be ported to say OS/400 V5R1 or Linux or FreeBSD or AIX? The bottom line is we used RPG III for years and years ( a decade? ) before any enhancements were introduced except for ANDxx and ORxx. Oh and I think they stuck an ENDIF in there too. So why do we need enhancements on each and every release? Is this a U.S. Government "use it or loose it" mentality? In my view, IBM is making RPG IV harder and harder to learn use, and in which to develop products. This can only add up to only one outcome... -Bob Cozzi www.RPGxTools.com RPG xTools - Enjoy programming again. -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fisher, Don Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:38 PM To: 'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries' Subject: RE: free-format move *USA date value to 6-digit numeric in YMDformat Sounds reasonable to me. Something else to consider is the size of the development budget for enhancements. If I'm the RPG development team and have a certain amount to spend on new enhancements, then I have a decision to make. Should I spend my money on creating 10 fully functional enhancements now or 30 somewhat functional enhancements that can be completed later? Perhaps completing the enhancements later allows me to spend money from a different budget? While considering this, I must keep in mind the large community of RPG programmers clamoring for the 75 or so enhancements on my list. Does putting out the 30 partial enhancements satisfy those programmers more than 10 complete ones? Donald R. Fisher, III Project Manager Roomstore Furniture Company (804) 784-7600 extension 2124 DFisher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <clip> My guess is that the thinking is to avoid the Master Disaster? The worst possible scenario would be to introduce a problem that affects a lot of people. Gradual change, with each release, allows the disasters to be minimized and repaired in the natural flow of the releases. PTFs have got to be expensive for everyone, right? <clip>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.