|
Herein lies the greats "downside" to RPGIV: > V5R2: > numFld = %int(%char(dateFld:*YMD0)); > V5R3: > numFld = %dec(dateFld:*YMD); So various ways to solve problems based on the release level. And I don't mean they added XML support in V5R4 and it should be PTF'd back to V3R1, I mean in V5R1, V5R2 and V5R3 there are subtle "enhancements" to the language that are all related (such as the example above) in which partial solutions are introduced in a point release and then the next part of the solution is introduced in the next point release and so on. Try teaching RPG IV to students at various release levels. Crap like the above is becoming more and more wide-spread in the language. "If you're on V5R3 you do it this way, if you're on 5.2 you do it this way, but if you're on 5.1 you can get around it by doing it this way..." IBM should stabilize RPG IV at a version boundary and release ALL enhancements to that version/release boundary. That is all V5 enhancements should work on V5R1 and later. If it won't work on V5R1 then they have to wait until V6 to ship the enhancement. I just don't understand why IBM doesn't do this. Sure there are political reason or fake technical reasons, but who cares about those? -Bob Cozzi
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.