× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Greg,
I have to read records by Company and Route first, so don't I need to use
READE or READPE?  I can't assume the records will be sequential.

Example assuming Date is keyed ascending:

Company = 'B1';
Route = 15;
Date = %date();
setgt (Company : Route : Date) LOGICAL1;

dou %eof(LOGICAL1);
      readpe (Company : Route) LOGICAL1;
      if not %eof(LOGICAL1);
            // Process this record
      endif;
enddo;




                                                                           
             "Fleming, Greg                                                
             \(ED\)"                                                       
             <GFLEMING@evergla                                          To 
             desdirect.com>            "RPG programming on the AS400 /     
             Sent by:                  iSeries" <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>    
             rpg400-l-bounces@                                          cc 
             midrange.com                                                  
                                                                   Subject 
                                       RE: READE vs. READPE performance    
             12/09/2005 02:08                                              
             PM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
              RPG programming                                              
              on the AS400 /                                               
                  iSeries                                                  
             <rpg400-l@midrang                                             
                  e.com>                                                   
                                                                           
                                                                           




If performance is an issue, don't use READE or READPE.

SetGT and ReadP.

I don't know if that is any faster or slower than reading forward, but I
can't think of any reason why there would be any difference.



>-----Original Message-----
>From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>On Behalf Of Ben_Pforsich@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 2:03 PM
>To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: READE vs. READPE performance
>
>
>Generally speaking, has anyone tried or know for a fact which of the
>following scenarios result in better performance (faster I/O?)?...
>1.  READE on logical with a descending key  (ex:  READE (Company :
Route :
>Date) LOGICAL1 where Date is keyed descending)
>2.  READPE on logical with an ascending key  (ex: READPE (Company :
Route :
>Date) LOGICAL2 where Date is keyed ascending).
>
>I want to read records in a history transaction file keyed with a date
>field starting with the most recent and going backward.  I'm trying to
>decide whether I should build a new logical over a fairly large
physical,
>or use an existing logical and use READPE instead of READE.  I will be
>likely reading potentially 10,000 to 50,000 records in one pass and
>performance is an issue.
>
>Let me know if you need more information, but I was hoping for a quick
and
>dirty response.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Ben Pforsich
>Programmer Analyst
>Bob Evans Farms, Inc.
>I/S Department
>Columbus, Ohio
>Ben_Pforsich@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>--
>This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing
list
>To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
>or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.


--
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.