× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I should probably also mention why.

If I understand correctly, READE and READPE don't read from the buffer,
they hit the file every time.

So you've got a lot of file I/O going on there.

Of course you'll need to put more code in to make sure you haven't read
back to the beginning of the file or past your key, but that's faster
than file I/O.  Just uglier.  



>-----Original Message-----
>From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>On Behalf Of Fleming, Greg (ED)
>Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 2:09 PM
>To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
>Subject: RE: READE vs. READPE performance
>
>If performance is an issue, don't use READE or READPE.
>
>SetGT and ReadP.
>
>I don't know if that is any faster or slower than reading forward, but
I
>can't think of any reason why there would be any difference.
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>On Behalf Of Ben_Pforsich@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 2:03 PM
>>To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: READE vs. READPE performance
>>
>>
>>Generally speaking, has anyone tried or know for a fact which of the
>>following scenarios result in better performance (faster I/O?)?...
>>1.  READE on logical with a descending key  (ex:  READE (Company :
>Route :
>>Date) LOGICAL1 where Date is keyed descending)
>>2.  READPE on logical with an ascending key  (ex: READPE (Company :
>Route :
>>Date) LOGICAL2 where Date is keyed ascending).
>>
>>I want to read records in a history transaction file keyed with a date
>>field starting with the most recent and going backward.  I'm trying to
>>decide whether I should build a new logical over a fairly large
>physical,
>>or use an existing logical and use READPE instead of READE.  I will be
>>likely reading potentially 10,000 to 50,000 records in one pass and
>>performance is an issue.
>>
>>Let me know if you need more information, but I was hoping for a quick
>and
>>dirty response.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>Ben Pforsich
>>Programmer Analyst
>>Bob Evans Farms, Inc.
>>I/S Department
>>Columbus, Ohio
>>Ben_Pforsich@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>--
>>This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing
>list
>>To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
>>or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>>at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
>
>
>--
>This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing
list
>To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
>or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.