RE: Call C from RPG performance -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Call C from RPG performance
From: "Dimitri Efimov" <defimov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:51:10 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

>If you're testing a C program that's ACTGRP(*NEW) vs. an RPG program
>thaqt's ACTGRP(*CALLER) then you're not comparing apples to apples. Make
>sure both programs are the same before comparing them.

That was the point

I recompiled C programa with ACTGRP(*CALLER) and now the difference is 10% only.



Aviso Banco Wiese Sudameris

Este mensaje es privado y confidencial y solamente para la
persona a la que va dirigido. Esta sujeto a los terminos que
aparecen en  http://www.bws.com.pe/aviso.shtml los cuales
forman parte de su contenido.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.