Re: Embedded SQL question

For the record, I agree with you guys and I took out the F spec.  I was 
only pointing out that I could see it possibly causing a problem, based on 
my own ignorance.  I didn't know it was possible to update a file without 
coding the filename on the F-Spec, SQL or not.  And I imagine I'm not the 
only one who didn't know that.

Mike


rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 09/19/2005 11:16:25 AM:

> Coding the F spec just so that someone can see that a file is updated 
> sounds more confusing.  I would think that the /EXEC SQL would give them 

> enough pause to think what happens.  Especially when they start to 
> understand SQL and wonder why you left in the F spec.
> 
> And I do realize what you are trying to accomplish.  I converted all my 
> *ENTRY PLIST's to Procedure Interfaces as recommended by the Sorcerer's 
> Guide, yet for those who still scan for *entry I still put in
>      D MYPGM           PI                        *ENTRY PLIST
> Which probably won't come in good to the list since of wrapping, but 
> basically the *ENTRY PLIST is off in the comment section.
> 
> Rob Berendt