|
I don't know what preconceived notions have to do with this particular statement. It's big, complex, and even the comments say it's hard to understand. My guess is that working with an SQL expert might help reduce some of the complexity of the statement. I know that using a MIN to get a single value like description just isn't right; you need to be doing some grouping at the very least. As to the entire concept of a single SQL being this complex, well that's something you have to decide whether makes sense. I'd have to guess there are less than a dozen people on this list who could modify that statement to add, say, a new report type. If your company is flush with people who can write that sort of code then great; if there's only one you have an exposure. It's just business, not religion. Joe > From: rob@xxxxxxxxx > > Actually, I didn't write it. It was written by our newest programmer > here. A gentleman we hired because the rest of his family does good > programming. We hired him away from an mechanical engineering job he > worked at. He learned embedded SQL from reading the manuals available at > infocenter, and frankly, I've learned some cool stuff from him. Sometimes > it's nice to come in fresh without any preconceived notions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.