|
IIRC, back in the bad old days there were performance implications on a
CALL depending on whether I used a literal ('PGMA') or a variable name
on the CALL instruction. With a literal, I seem to remember that the
operating system only resolved the pointer to the program the first
time, while with a variable it was resolved every time.
Is this the same with the EXTPGM keyword on a prototype? That is, if I
key in a literal in the EXTPGM keyword, is there a performance advantage
as opposed to using a variable name?
Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.