|
Good points. I spoke the words and I was ambiguous. How would I be less ambiguous? It wasn't my intention to dismiss the work we do, but it is my intention that we keep our eye on the ball, which to me means running the business. Beyond that I would have nothing useful to add. --------------------------------- Booth Martin http://www.martinvt.com --------------------------------- -------Original Message------- From: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries Date: 06/23/05 14:11:52 To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries Subject: Re: Assembly programmers do it a byte at a time Well, with all of the complexity hidden, they wouldn't need us, now would they? I have a problem with blanket statements like that one. "All of the complexity should be hidden." This type of statement allows the stater to use it and direct it at anything he or she finds contrary to his/her taste. "It's too complex". Granted, I agree that keeping things reasonably simple is a principle of good programming, but like all principles, they must be applied together to make a good product. If my only goal was to make things simple, I would say use WRKQRY and DFU for everything. simple. Runs forever, and can't accomodate all the need, but heaven knows, that nasty complexity is gone.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.