|
C not cross-platform? I thought C could be used on any platform, provided you have a compiler on that platform (similar to have a jvm on the platform to run java; without it, no java). IBM does not want to support multiple platforms, which is their right. But I think IBM is going the wrong way, forcing us to maintain the machine, code the programmes and display data on another platform, in stead of enhancing/improving the original system. Just my pet peeve (and in the wrong thread). Regards, Carel Teijgeler *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 6-6-05 at 11:05 Scott Klement wrote: >> WDSc is written in Java. Should run with no problems on the Mac. Free to >> order from IBM if you've got a license for OS400. > >I wish that were so! But it's not. I've talked to IBMers a few times >about this, and they've made it clear that WDSc only works in Windows. >Several of it's compontents are still written in C (I believe the >compilers/verifiers are the main thing) and therefore are not cross-platform. > >This is one of my biggest pet peeves -- that IBM rams Windows down your >throat. They tell you that you shouldn't use SEU, and then only give you >an alternative if you're a windows user.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.