|
Aren't you going to have to do: D DSName DS D Field 3A Dim(3) D Part1 3A Overlay(Field) D Part2 3A Overlay(Field: *Next) D Part3 3A Overlay(Field: *Next) -----Original Message----- From: Michael Jacobsen [mailto:MJacobsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 2:00 PM To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: DS / Overlay keyword I have a question about using Overlay(Fieldname: *Next). This (simplied example) works: D DSName DS D Field 3A Dim(3) D Part1 1 3 D Part2 4 6 D Part3 7 9 But I want to do this without using positions to define the fields. I tried this: D DSName DS D Field 3A Dim(3) D Part1 3A Overlay(Field: *Next) D Part2 3A Overlay(Field: *Next) D Part3 3A Overlay(Field: *Next) And I get this error: RNF7303S Subfield PART2 defined with keyword OVERLAY is too big; specification ignored. RNF7303S Subfield PART3 defined with keyword OVERLAY is too big; specification ignored. I want Field(1) = Part1, Field(2) = Part2, and Field(3) = Part3 Is there any way to do this using Overlay or without defining the fields using positions? The fields Part1, Part2, Part3, are also already defined in an external file. I don't know if that will make a difference or not. Thanks! Mike
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.