RE: RLU (PRTF FILE) vs *AUTO REPORT (RPT FILE)

If by RPT you are referring to an RPG source type of RPT by all means RUN a 
different direction.  Our core application was originally written entirely 
using RPT programs with lots of copy books that contain both I-specs and 
C-specs.  It is a nightmare to maintain.  In addition, the cool new development 
tools (WDSc) and language enhancements don't work with RPT programs.  WDSc will 
at least edit and compile one but none of the neat features like outline view 
work.

Just my $.02.

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Luqman
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:11 AM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RLU (PRTF FILE) vs *AUTO REPORT (RPT FILE)


Which report utility is more better while working in AS/400 Reports, PRTF or
RPT File with Auto Report Feature.

Best Regards,

Luqman



--
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.



Privileged and Confidential.  This e-mail, and any attachments there to, is 
intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain 
privileged or confidential information.  If you have received this e-mail in 
error, please notify me immediately by a return e-mail and delete this e-mail.  
You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
e-mail and/or any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited.