|
There was a recent article in, I believe in Iseries News, on using Keyed Data Queues to support sorting on any column. Using QSORT or User Indexs would work, also. -----Original Message----- From: rob@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 1:41 PM To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries Subject: Re: Arrays Ok, I understand what you say about performance tuning. RPG has those issues too, like figuring out record blocking, primary vs SETLL/READ, etc. Some application questions though. 1) If a user said "On this inquiry screen I would like to position my cursor on any column and sort by that column (and you have seven columns) would you: a - Create 7 logicals and use RPG native I/O b - Front end the code with OPNQRYF (but since I don't use that I forget if you have to redefine the key on the f-spec to match the sort order) c - Use SQL d - Tell the user it can't be done. e - Offload the data to another platform and have them manipulate it there. f - Put it on your to-do list, but always at the bottom priority to never get done. Rob Berendt -- Group Dekko Services, LLC Dept 01.073 PO Box 2000 Dock 108 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com Tony Carolla <carolla@xxxxxxxxx> Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 03/29/2005 02:03 PM Please respond to RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject Re: Arrays <snip> > SQL is well worth the coin paid to obtain it. Harness it's power & you'll > never want to type the command WRKQRY again.... < Thanks, < Tommy Holden </snip> Haven't typed in WRKQRY in years (~10). > I don't find it "that complex". > Even Joe Pluta occasionally finds SQL useful. I think that if you never > use it, then it is like the person who finds he can get everything done > with a hammer; when it is the only tool in their toolbox. > > Rob Berendt I don't find SQL too complex by any means. I find it simple, and have used it on many platforms. I guess I see it this way: You can build your SQL statements, and build your summaries "on the fly" with no extra code (SQL is code, BTW), but when you run them, and they take long, what can you do? Index. Study the query optimizer -- what is it choosing? Why won't it use my index? Which type of index? EVI? Can I bribe the crazy thing? Will it use the index when the user hits the view a little differently? I have spent alot of time studying indexing, on DB2 and SQL server as well. It is fascinating, but I just find it easier to analyze the data request I am building, and make my own 'access plan', write the code to do it, and it's done. I would bet that any quick-running SQL statement can be made to run just as fast or even faster using RPG. -- "Enter any 11-digit prime number to continue..." -- This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.