× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



<snip>
> I've found that the less parms a procedure accept the less frustration the 
> programmer get when trying to use it.  Yes, parms helps readability, but too 
> many of them might not good for programmer's health.
> 
> modularity = readability. (70% agreed).
</snip>

I thought this way at first, but just because a proc accepts less
parms, doesn't mean it can't be frustrating.  What about passing
simply one parm -- a pointer to a DS?  or even a DS Array?!?!

I agree that less is better, but only if using less parms is a product
of design, and not just getting tricky.


-- 
"Enter any 11-digit prime number to continue..."

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.