|
MOVE CORRESPONDING was always something I missed from Cobol.
Now we just need an ALTER for GOTO ;-)
Keith
Bob Cozzi wrote:
I'd rather use the COBOL MOVE CORRESPONDING, at least that means something
to me. How about Eval(C) instead?
I'd even settle for an ambiguous MCORR (move corresponding) opcode over
EVAL-CORR.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.