|
> why ILE is faster than OPM? or point me links in IBM where I can read.. Static linkage, I should think. Whenever an OPM program has to call something outside itself, it has to do a dynamically-linked call, because OPM has no concept of a linkage editor. ILE, on the other hand, has the ability to link multiple separately-compiled modules together statically (the CRTPGM command invokes a linkage editor), and much of its runtime routines appear to be linked together in service programs, which (I'm guessing) become static calls once the service program has been resolved and pulled into the activation group, whereas the OPM runtime routines tend to be lots of separate dynamic calls. -- JHHL
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.