|
Eduard, > Should I have expected this?? The reference manual says it matches the job format and says nothing about following the H spec option for DateEdit(), so yes, I'd say you should have expected it. But what I prefer to do is simply name a true date field in the result field of a TIME operation. Unlike RPG/400, you may name a time, date, or timestamp field in addition to a numeric field with 6, 12, or 14 digits. Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.