|
> For this file: > A R REC > A FLD1 10A > A FLD2 10A VARLEN > A FLD3 10A Just an additional comment on this file. I believe the original poster said that they wanted to save space. In the case of a 10 character field you certainly won't save anything - but even if FLD2 were 1,000 bytes long, if the DDS is coded in this way you would _not_ save space. In order to save space you must specify the optional length parameter. e.g. A FLD2 1000A VARLEN(100) This tells the system to only store 100 bytes worth of data _unless_ the size of the field exceeds 100 bytes, in which case the excess is stored in a separate area of the database. In either case the field is expanded as the record is retrieved and will always appear as its full length in your program or DSPPFM or ..... The figure should be your best guess at the norm for the field. Writing a program to analyze existing data might be a good idea, as would reviewing the usage from time to time if want the file to be efficient both in terms of performance and storage. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.