|
I don't understand. What good will this do you? What are you going to do with the hash code? Wouldn't it make more sense to use a standard hash code that's already been well tested and documented, such as MD5? On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 Chris_Bougher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I need to compute a hash type code for an array of 3 character strings. The > strings are always 3 digit numeric values and do not repeat within a > sequence. I was thinking that I could add the numbers together multiplying > by their position in the list. i.e. > > array = '100', '200', '300', '400', '500' > hash = (100 * 1) + (200 * 2) + (300 * 3) + (400 * 4) + (500 * 5) = 5500 > > Does anyone see any issues with this method? Does anyone have a better > method? >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.