RE: QSYSINC/QUSLFLD usage in RPG in V5R2

rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>   2. Re: QSYSINC/QUSLFLD usage in RPG in V5R2 (Krish Thirumalai)
>
>So we can hope that IBM will do the right thing in the future, :-)

Krish:

Regardless of IBM's support, I would still use copies of the source members 
rather than compiling with direct references to QSYSINC source files. I don't 
mind updating my copies nor would I mind seeing IBM's recommended conditional 
compile source directives.

But I would _not_ want to get caught trying to track down a simple typo in one 
of their upgraded source members just because I had an emergency fix that I 
needed to promote to production shortly after some system upgrade. I'll make my 
copies and test and debug in a development environment. And until I've done 
that, I'll want to keep referring to the ones that I'm already confortable with.

It'll take a lot of convincing before I ever recommend to refer to QSYSINC 
members directly. It's too easy to do your own copies and the benefit is far 
too great.

Tom Liotta

-- 
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788 x313
Fax    253-872-7904
http://www.powertech.com


__________________________________________________________________
Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

Netscape. Just the Net You Need.

New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp