Good News Everybody!
The new search engine is LIVE!
Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.
|
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:18:10 +1100, Simon Coulter <shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 16/11/2004, at 10:01 AM, Mike Eovino wrote: > > > I won't call our design either good or bad, but we do put related > > subprocedures together into service programs. So (as far as we know) > > all the subprocedures in each service program should be grouped > > together. > > I meant: Given that A calls B and B calls A maybe they are related > functions and should be in a single service program rather than in two. > > You could bind the A module and B module together into service program > X. This would make sense if A and B are related functions. They are somewhat related, but this would lead to a very big service program (there are actually more than two subprocedures in each service program).
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.