|
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:18:10 +1100, Simon Coulter <shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 16/11/2004, at 10:01 AM, Mike Eovino wrote: > > > I won't call our design either good or bad, but we do put related > > subprocedures together into service programs. So (as far as we know) > > all the subprocedures in each service program should be grouped > > together. > > I meant: Given that A calls B and B calls A maybe they are related > functions and should be in a single service program rather than in two. > > You could bind the A module and B module together into service program > X. This would make sense if A and B are related functions. They are somewhat related, but this would lead to a very big service program (there are actually more than two subprocedures in each service program).
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
