|
On 16/11/2004, at 7:56 AM, Mike Eovino wrote:
Service Program A was made from Module A and contains subprocedures 1 and 2
Service Program B was made from Module B and contains subprocedures 3 and 4
Subprocedure 2 calls subprocedure 3
Subprocedure 4 calls subprocedure 1
stuff deleted
Each service program is dependent upon the other.
We can fake this out by moving the existing objects over as well, but this raised an interesting question: How do we keep this from happening in the future?
The only thing we can think of is to limit service programs to a single subprocedure, but is this really something we want to do?
Regards, Simon Coulter. -------------------------------------------------------------------- FlyByNight Software AS/400 Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/ Phone: +61 3 9419 0175 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\ Fax: +61 3 9419 0175 \ / X ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \ --------------------------------------------------------------------
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.