|
Hey Frank, shouldn't output be like this for the following data??? CITY1 T0B0Z0 CITY2 T0A0A0 CITY3 T0A0C0 CITY4 T4A1A1 CITY4 T4A1A2 CITY4 T4A1A3 CITY4 T4A1B1 CITY4 T4A1B2 CITY4 T4A1B3 CITY4 T4A1D1 CITY4 T4A1D2 CITY4 T4A1D3 Output file: Program needs to group/range the zip codes like this: CITY1 T0B0Z0 - 000000 CITY2 T0A0A0 - 000000 CITY3 T0A0C0 - 000000 CITY4 T4A1A1 - T4A1A3 <<< CITY4 T4A1B1 - T4A1B3 <<< CITY4 T4A1D1 - T4A1D3 <<< Your original output file showed this: CITY1 T0B0Z0 - 000000 CITY2 T0A0A0 - 000000 CITY3 T0A0C0 - 000000 CITY4 T4A1A1 - T4A1B3 (compare w/records for CITY4 above) CITY4 T4A1D1 - T4A1D3 (compare w/records for CITY4 above) Or I may have really missed something important. (Wouldn't be the first time) Let us know. Thanks -G
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.