× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hey Frank, shouldn't output be like this for the following data???

 

CITY1       T0B0Z0

CITY2       T0A0A0

CITY3       T0A0C0

CITY4       T4A1A1

CITY4       T4A1A2

CITY4       T4A1A3

CITY4       T4A1B1

CITY4       T4A1B2

CITY4       T4A1B3

CITY4       T4A1D1

CITY4       T4A1D2

CITY4       T4A1D3

 

Output file:

Program needs to group/range the zip codes like this:

CITY1       T0B0Z0 - 000000

CITY2       T0A0A0 - 000000

CITY3       T0A0C0 - 000000

CITY4       T4A1A1 - T4A1A3  <<<

CITY4       T4A1B1 - T4A1B3  <<< 

CITY4       T4A1D1 - T4A1D3  <<<

 

Your original output file showed this:

CITY1       T0B0Z0 - 000000

CITY2       T0A0A0 - 000000

CITY3       T0A0C0 - 000000

CITY4       T4A1A1 - T4A1B3  (compare w/records for CITY4 above)

CITY4       T4A1D1 - T4A1D3  (compare w/records for CITY4 above)

 

Or I may have really missed something important. (Wouldn't be the first
time)

Let us know. Thanks

-G

 

 


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.