Re: Suggestion: File to use when compile

I don't believe changing SEU would be a huge deal (for those that
still use it).  What we are talking about here is modifying the
compile module, either way.  You either do it your way and have it run
arbitrary commands are do arbitrary 'stuff' at the top of the source
code, in another specially defined compiler directive section of code,
or you build on what you already have, in the header spec, and/or the
ExtFile() keywords.  I would think that, looking forward, it makes
more sense to build on what's already there.

Either way, you're talking about modifying the compiler.  


On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:58:30 -0500, Lim Hock-Chai
<lim.hock-chai@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> command override is a one time deal (if ibm ever create it and function as 
> what I have in mind).  After it got created, I can override any compile 
> command parm.  If ibm add a new parm to the compile command, you can right 
> away use it in the override command.  A keyword, however, need to build into 
> the SEU and specific compiler to recognize it.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Tony Carolla
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 4:48 PM
> To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
> Subject: Re: Suggestion: File to use when compile
> 
> ... And why would it take longer (10 years) to create a new H-spec or
> a modified F-spec, rather than a completely new type of animal
> (command override?  command default?)
> 
> --
> This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
> 
> 


-- 
"Enter any 11-digit prime number to continue..."