× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Depending on the particular devil you want to deal with...

Here's what I had before I developed my pre-compiler:

      * Prior to compiling this program, the following must
      * be performed in the job prior to compilation:
      *  CRTPF FILE(QTEMP/AR123W) SRCFILE(DRLLIB/QDDSSRC) SIZE(50000)
      * This program must be compiled with
      *  USRPRF(*OWNER) TGTRLS(V4R5M0)

I would have to *remember* to do the CRTPF prior to compiling, and I'd have
to either compile the program interactively, or create a CL program that did
the CRTPF QTEMP/AR123W and the compile together.  Bleahhh.

Now, with my pre-compiler:
      * Prior to compiling this program, the following must
      * be performed in the job prior to compilation:
      **#$%PRE: CRTPF FILE(QTEMP/AR123W) SRCFILE(DRLLIB/QDDSSRC) SIZE(50000)
      * This program must be compiled with
      **#$%COM: USRPRF(*OWNER) TGTRLS(V4R5M0)

Piece of cake.  Instead of PDM option 14, I've defined Z1 and use it for all
compiles, regardless of whether there are any pre-compiler directives or
not.  The important thing is that one does not *need* to use my
pre-compiler, but they would still have to do the steps manually like I did
before.

The only gotcha is that whoever compiles the source with PDM 14 has to view
the source to determine whether there are any pre-compiler directives.  It
would help that the first 20 lines of the source member are colorized,
blocked, blinking, etc. so that it STANDS OUT to the person who may not
otherwise realize that there are special considerations needed to compile.

Yeah, it would be better if IBM did this automagically.  And they may choose
to do it for RPG, but what are the chances they would do it for every type
of compile source?  "When Pigs Fly" comes to mind.  Til then, I'll keep
using my utility.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx / Scott Klement
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 3:45 PM
>
> > And for that matter, it isn't rocket science for a home-grown utility
> > to do it either, with the added bonus you can do it with any source
> > type, not just RPG.  I did one many years ago which handles both pre &
> > post compile commands (with either continuation or cancel when errors
> > occur), compile overrides, etc.  And works with RPG, CL, DDS, etc.
>
> That's nice... but then outside consultants who work on our system
> wouldn't be familiar with them.  New programmers we hire wouldn't be
> familiar.  If I send my code to someone else (such as demonstrating a
> technique in this e-mail forum) then they wouldn't be able to run them
> without installing my special precompiler.
>
> Yes, I know... I can teach outside people about the utility. I can teach
> new programmers. I can remove the precompile stuff before distributing my
> code.
>
> But, if IBM included these things with the compilers, I wouldn't have to.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.