|
> From: Tom Jedrzejewicz > > I totally understand, but I was just asking if any attempt was made to > rule any of those out as variables affecting the results. Again, I ask you to come to the IAAI to help us do that. Current results: 1 Insert Test - Native I/O 1.77 2 Insert Test - SQL-A (VALUES) 6.35 3 Insert Test - SQL-B (SINGLE DS) 6.16 4 Insert Test - SQL-C (10 ROWS) 1.11 5 Insert Test - SQL-C (100 ROWS) .43 6 Update Test - Native I/O 1.61 7 Update Test - SQL-A (CURSOR/FETCH) 4.95 8 Update Test - SQL-B (UPDATE SINGLE) 11.61 9 Update Test - SQL-C (10 ROWS) 5.25 10 Update Test - SQL-C (100 ROWS) 2.34 In the update test, Native I/O beats all flavors of SQL pretty handily, even updating 100 rows at a time. Again, these are highly preliminary tests, and if you don't like them, COME HELP FIX THEM! http://forums.plutabrothers.com/IAAI Joe P.S. Something ugly: adding just ONE extra logical view caused the native I/O write to slow down a ton. From .3 seconds to 1.77 seconds. It had a milder, but still negative, effect on the SQL as well.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.