|
I'd rather use %editc(field: 'X'), it is a lot easier to see that the field is being moved and converted and where. Using the overlay you need to go to the definitions section in order to know that there is a hidden "move - convert", Unless, of course, you intend to make your code hard to read. On Friday 06 August 2004 12:09, James H H Lampert wrote: > > Grin. > > Use MOVE. > > Grin. > > But would that work if the original field is binary or packed? > > Personally, I still regard the %edit option as being a case of > "overthinking the plumbing" ("the easier it is to stop up the drain"), > unless one needs to handle negative values, and would stick with my own > solution of overlaying character and zoned fields in a data structure. > > -- > JHHL > > > -- > This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list > To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l > or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l. >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.