× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi Tim,

> I'm getting this error....  Is there an H spec to remove it, or do I
> use an error code to trap it.?

You don't trap it.  You fix your code so that it doesn't overflow.



>       All four of these variables, are defined ast 17,6  So I'm ok, if I
> have to drop accuracy after 7 places..

If your fields are 17,6, that means that the result of the calculation
exceeds 99999999999.999999.  If you use the old DIV/SUB/MULT/ADD op-codes,
what will happen is that the leftmost digit will be lost.  In this case,
that's a qty of 100 billion (or more) of something.

When they designed capability of doing expressions (i.e. EVAL) in RPG IV,
they decided that discarding the most significant digit would be a bad
idea, so they now give you the "target for numeric operation is too small"
error messaage so that you don't overlook losing 100 billion of something.

If you weren't expecting a number that large, you might want to check your
code -- something is wrong.   If you do expect to receive numbers larger
than 100 billion, you should expand your fields so that you don't get this
error.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.