|
Hans, Absolutely, that's why I suggested %toupper() it is something everybody needs, deals with the long return values and also has performance implications. So the first question is why would you use iconv() instead of QlgConvertCase? -Bob -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hans Boldt Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 8:39 AM To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Case conversion (was Re: Large Return values) Bob Cozzi wrote: > Hans, > Would you mind explaining what advantage an IBM-implementation of say... > "%toupper()" built-in function would provide over a programmer-written > "toupper()" procedure? > For example, would a long returned value be an issue, would it be language > independent, would it have any performance implications? > Just to make clear from the start, this is strictly a theoretical question since a %TOUPPER() built-in is not a future objective for us. I'm not sure I see any advantages of a %TOUPPER() built-in since it would be nothing more than a wrapper for the function iconv(). Cheers! Hans _______________________________________________ This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.