|
I have started using the following method for renaming any indicators I use
(which are VERY few).
D IndicatorPtr S * Inz(%Addr(*In))
D DS Based(IndicatorPtr)
D PrtOverflow 99 99
As you probably already know, this allows me to use the PrtOverflow in my
code instead of the vague *In99. Beautiful. But now, in my calc specs, in
testing the indicator for 'on'-ness, I can't do the following:
If PrtOverflow;
Write Header;
PrtOverflow=*Off;
EndIf;
This works if I use *In99 instead of PrtOverflow. The first line of that
statement brings up the following error:
*RNF7423 30 000133 A relational expression or indicator is expected for
logical operations
I have to change the first line to
If PrtOverflow=*On;
I have been told by a good friend of mine that the statement is basically
asking, 'If it's true that it's true'. Is there a way I can change the
technique to allow the first 'if' statement?
Tony Carolla
MedAmerica Billing Services, Inc.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.