|
Access path sharing is labeled "implicit access path sharing" and it's no for both, which means each access path is unique to each file (the system owns access paths). The index size is quite different, and I don't know enough about DB2 to know if an EVI is at work (I don't think you can create an EVI with DDS, however) or the binary radix tree works differently for selects and omits. There are two more possibilities: your testing procedure is flawed (signing off and signing on doesn't necessarily purge data from memory); this means you'd have to run the test one way, re-impl, and run it the other way, re-impl, etc., several times, probably, to rule out any unknown/external influences on the testing oricedure. The other possibility is the nature of your data: if you have a lot of "A"'s, "omit" might work faster. I don't know if the "omit" logic is in the access path itself or if the test's performed by DB2 when you retrieve records. -reeve Regards, Reeve Fritchman Ayers Rock Software LLC 4915 S. West Shore Boulevard Tampa, Florida 33611-3329 (813) 831-8574 (voice) (813) 832-6391 (fax)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.