|
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 16:33, John Brandt Sr. wrote: > I've already corrected the %Eof and %Found statement. > > Is this simple enough for everyone? (If not, the next one will have > indicators in it) > > C myklist chain myfile > C dow not %Found > C eval rrn = rrn + 1 > C write mysubfile > C myklist reade myfile > C end Sorry to trouble you, but you still have an important problem. %FOUND is not set by the READE opcode. %FOUND is only set in the context of a file operation by CHAIN, DELETE, SETGT, SETLL. Therefore, you still have the possibility of an infinite loop with this code. An earlier poster already gave you the answer, which is to abandon the chain/reade combo if you wish to use BIF's, and go with SETLL/READE opcode pairs. I don't mind indicator code, I'm used to seeing it. -- Regards, Rich Current Conditions in Des Moines, IA Overcast Temp 64.4F Winds out of the East at 8mph
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
