× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



"Rusty Luse" wrote:
> 
> Another example which I think is even more efficient. :)
> 
> C     myklist       setll     myfile
> C     myklist       reade     myfile
> C                   dow       not %eof(myfile)
> C                   eval      rrn = rrn + 1
> C                   write     mysubfile
> C     myklist       reade     myfile
> C                   enddo

Rusty,
I think you'll find if you look at the code that the compiler
will generate that your example is EXACTLY the same
as John Brandt's, thus no more or less efficient.

SETLL followed by an unconditional READE is 
exactly the same as a CHAIN!

The only way to make it more efficient would be to check
to see if a record was found after the SETLL, and *not*
execute any of the following code if a record was not found!

Regards,
Steve Landess
Austin, Texas
(512) 423-0935

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.