× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



| -----Original Message-----
| [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Joe Pluta

| At the same
| time, should everyone who uses exponentiation know floating point?  I
| don't think that's reasonable.

Imo, not only unreasonable, but unnecessary.  Especially if rumors about >31
digit accuracy coming in 530 (V5R3M0) come to pass.

| -----Original Message-----
| From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Simon Coulter

| Anyone who uses floating point should know that it is an approximation
| and is only accurate to nearly 16 digits. I understand 16 digits of
| precision exceeds the experimental accuracy of all known constants of
| nature but that doesn't help in the business world.

Am I understanding correctly that the 400 doesn't even Need floating point
to solve all known Scientific math problems??  (Of course, Not suggesting
it's unnecessary, because of "requirements" of backwards compatibility.)



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.