|
Icbw, but my understanding is that the system creats implicit *ACCPTH sharing automatically, regardless of which order the *LF were created. ? Pretty sure it used to, but that's iirc. | -----Original Message----- | [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich | III | I've seen cases where index sharing was _possible_, but no one | had done what | was needed to enable it. If you have 4 logicals, keyed: | | A | A, B | A, B, C | A, B, C, D | | And you created them in that order you'll have 4 indexes, but if | you created | them in the reverse order you'll have one. _BIG_ performance | difference. It | can be worth it to examine the logicals for index sharing | possibilities too.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.