|
Bob said: > I've always said, if you must use optimization use *BASIC with RPG as > using *FULL will take more time to compile than you will every save in > runtime performance. :) You are more right than you know, Bob. In my commercial experience (not scientific computing) fine-tuning program code in the form of choosing this operation code over that (Z-ADD vs MOVE) or this data type over that (packed vs zoned vs int) can result in improvements in the 50% range. Fine tuning I/O (as in not reading all the fields in the MAPICS item master, but creating a logical which has only the few fields you need) commonly and easily results in improvements orders of magnitude in size. Personally, I like to see benchmarks like Steve is doing. I _like_ knowing what is happening under the covers. But when I'm given an application that can use a performance boost, I always start at the I/O. --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.