RE: Peer Code Review (was RE: GOTO - I still love you!!!) -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

  3. Re: Peer Code Review (was RE: GOTO - I still love you!!!)
     (James Rich)

Another use is to put a new topic there (by editing the Sandbox page) that
has code that has been discussed here.  For example, the code that
recently came up about the socket problem.  The code was posted, and a
couple of people posted fixes.  That code could become a new topic and
then helpful posters could change the code to answer questions.  Maybe
even a body of code would be built up this way that answers common
questions or illustrates common techniques.

I think this should be emphasized. Rather than posting problem or sample code directly in the list, post it in Twiki. I've let numerous threads slide because posting an example would be too lengthy. There's no such concern with Twiki. The list posting becomes a link back to a Twiki subject.

Further, any posted example gets reviewed and glitches potentially removed. Every participant benefits.

Tom Liotta

--
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788 x313
Fax    253-872-7904
http://www.powertech.com

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.