RE: Service pgm signatures - use *current & *prv or not

Just curious, what would you use to compose the signature?

We use signatures in our shop and they work nice when you make sure you have
covered all of your bases.  If we didn't have to distribute our software we
would just recompile all of the programs that used a particular changed
service program and be done with it.

Aaron Bartell

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
meovino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 4:46 PM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Service pgm signatures - use *current & *prv or not



All,

In the Club Tech iSeries newsletter (edited by Scott Klement), the author
(I can't tell if it was actually Scott or not) suggests you use your own
signature, and that you just add new exports to the bottom of the list.
This seems *very* straightforward, and I'm thinking about suggesting this
for our shop standard (there is not one right now).  Any reasons why we
*shouldn't* do this?

Thanks!

Mike E.



_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.