Re: Procedure Question

[Scott Mildenberger <scottmildenberger@xxxxxxxxx>]

>From source #1 can we see the call and the prototype used?  As
for this being your proof of concept, you will want to
investigate putting any reusable procedures such as source #2
into a service program.

Scott Mildenberger
--- Duane Kehoe <dkehoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>    I have left all activation groups to there defaults(because
> I really don't
>    know what they are :-[ )  Also, I tried Bob's suggestion to
> reclaim
>    activation groups without success.  The programs are
> parsing routines and
>    reports.  What happens(in a nutshell) is source#1 reads a
> file containing
>    EDI segments, source#2 is called to parse said EDI
> segments(which are
>    passed into source#2 via parameters) and return the data
> contained in the
>    requested element.  The reason I have 2 source files is I
> want to have
>    source#2 be used by a number of other programs as the
> parsing logic is
>    exactly the same regardless of what the caller / requester
> is doing with
>    the data.  The current code base is being used as a proof
> of concept for
>    procedures as our shop does not currently utilize them.  I
> do have the
>    CALLP coded in source#1 as well, however it is my
> understanding that callp
>    is inferred here, I may be wrong though.



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/