|
| >> But if the procedure is written in another language, then those | languages do not have a PI defined so there is no checking until run time. | | All languages have the equivalent of a PI (RPG's *ENTRY PLIST is the same | thing with different syntax) but not all have prototyping - notably CL and | COBOL do not.
C has prototyping? Does the RPGLE compiler validate against the C prototype???
| The real problem with this statement however is "there is no | checking until | run time". Leave out the words "until run time" and the statement is | accurate. i.e. "there is no checking". The reason that prototyping is | valuable is _because_ there is no run time checking of parms.
That's in the C-world. CPF checks number of parms, and programs that pass wrong data types consistently error off. They don't corrupt data, generally speaking.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.