RE: Starting out with sub-procedures -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Starting out with sub-procedures
From: "jt" <jt@xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:34:11 -0400
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Would that be the case if the wrapper was compiled ACTGRP(*CALLER)...?

"Still diggin'"
- Dave Winer www.scripting.com

| -----Original Message-----
| [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Douglas Handy

| Bear in mind that QCMDEXC is call level sensitive when used for 
| OVRxxx commands.
| In general I prefer to use a wrapper like Hans has shown.  
| However you must
| consider the extra call level in certain scenarios.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Starting out with sub-procedures , Douglas Handy

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.